The last few weeks have been a turbulent time for American politics. Following Trump’s inauguration, his administration quickly began to implement its agenda. So far, that agenda has focused on criticizing existing institutions and either withdrawing from them or dismantling them entirely. The Paris Climate Agreement and the World Health Organization are two notable international establishments Trump has decided to exit, citing economic implications and an unfair burden on American taxpayers. There is some validity to these statements; however, there are severe repercussions that he has failed to consider.
  The Paris Agreement, adopted in 2015, was designed to unite nations against a common enemy: climate change. These concepts are scientific fact, but according to Trump, it’s all a hoax. Abandoning the agreement means an end to the unnecessary climate regulations that are repressing our economic prosperity. Finally, an opportunity to drill for domestic oil as much as our little hearts desire. DRILL, BABY, DRILL! And that’s what the future holds: a disregard for scientific principles and the future of our planet in exchange for momentary economic gain. With less confining legislation, there will be nothing holding the United States accountable. This will inevitably lead to an increase in emissions and, in turn, an acceleration of global warming. You AP Environmental students may find this idea familiar. The tragedy of the commons refers to a situation where individuals who enjoy unrestricted access to a shared resource will ultimately act in their own self-interest, exploiting it to the point of depletion. We are relinquishing our identity as a country dedicated to supporting and implementing environmental policy.
  The United States was a founding member of the World Health Organization all the way back in 1948. The WHO is dedicated to the well-being of all people, guided by science. They promote global health and equal access to healthcare. Shouldn’t these be governmental priorities? Trump has stated that the United States pays a disproportionate amount of money into the program relative to its population. Rather than negotiation or spending reduction, he has opted for a complete departure. The most obvious result is that we lose influence over international health policy. A lack of participation makes the United States vulnerable. If you’re not sitting at the table, it’s likely you’re on the menu. Moreover, rescinding our funding means a reduction in support for healthcare systems in developing countries. According to the New York Times, roughly 400 million people lack access to rudimentary healthcare. It’s morally unacceptable to be part of the issue, especially when we have the ability to provide aid.
  In short, Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and the World Health Organization will have detrimental long-term effects and is not justified by the small temporary gains he has promised.